<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Darwinian Theory of Fashion Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rickhorowitz.com/art/photography-art/a-darwinian-theory-of-fashion-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rickhorowitz.com/art/photography-art/a-darwinian-theory-of-fashion-photography/</link>
	<description>All Things Rick™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lia taa</title>
		<link>http://rickhorowitz.com/art/photography-art/a-darwinian-theory-of-fashion-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>lia taa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 06:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickhorowitz.com/?p=170#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>sorry about bad grammar, but i hope my point is clear.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about bad grammar, but i hope my point is clear.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lia taa</title>
		<link>http://rickhorowitz.com/art/photography-art/a-darwinian-theory-of-fashion-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>lia taa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 06:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickhorowitz.com/?p=170#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>Saying contemporary f. photography is crap and the old f. photography is art is like saying mozart is great and beatles in 1960. or Beatles is great and Oasis sucks.. wow, what a remarkable insight!!!! apart from comparing apples with oranges, f. photography just like any other form of art/communication is a reflection of the society it is adressing and love it or hate it but this is the way modern world functions... more than ever fashion photography have evolved into different genres and styles these days and again compared to 50 years ago there are +1000 good photographers working... what is art afterall? old people should stop whining about how things were better previously and start giving some effort to finding analogies between their youth and the youth now.. then i think they might realize that what avedon did then and what teller is doing now, in theory, is not so different at all..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying contemporary f. photography is crap and the old f. photography is art is like saying mozart is great and beatles in 1960. or Beatles is great and Oasis sucks.. wow, what a remarkable insight!!!! apart from comparing apples with oranges, f. photography just like any other form of art/communication is a reflection of the society it is adressing and love it or hate it but this is the way modern world functions&#8230; more than ever fashion photography have evolved into different genres and styles these days and again compared to 50 years ago there are +1000 good photographers working&#8230; what is art afterall? old people should stop whining about how things were better previously and start giving some effort to finding analogies between their youth and the youth now.. then i think they might realize that what avedon did then and what teller is doing now, in theory, is not so different at all..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

